Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7672 14
Original file (NR7672 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490

 

BAN
Docket No.NRO7672-14
5 December 2014

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 25 November 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
Support thereof, his naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies, In addition, the Board considered the
length of time in which you decided that your declination for
Survivor Benefit Plan coverage was erroneous due to your claim
that you were misinformed.

However after careful and conscientious consideration of the
entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In making this determination, the Board
opined that you and your spouse made a conscious decision to
decline SBP coverage, noting that your Survivor Benefit Plan
Election Form, (DD Form 2656), in Section XI - Certification,
you signed to decline SBP coverage with spousal concurrence.
Furthermore, it stated"..if I exercise my option to terminate the
SBP, future participation is barred.” Additionally, the Board
noted that when your spouse concurred, she agreed to the
statement, “I hereby concur with the Survivor Benefit Plan
election made by my spouse. I have received information that
explains the options available and the effects of those options.
I know that retired pay stops on the day the retiree dies.”

Therefore, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request. ,
Docket No.NRO7672-14

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
evidence within one year from the date of the Board's decision.
New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board
prior to making its decision in this case. In this regard, it
is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity
a -taenee to ail official records.

é
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is'on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely

ROBERT J. O’NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019092

    Original file (20140019092.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her military records to show she elected not to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). Her 20-year letter stated no such default option and she does not want insurance premiums taken from her retired pay. The evidence of record shows she received her 20-year letter in March 2001.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016893

    Original file (20130016893.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Both believed that they made the correct election on the form not to participate in the SBP; however, SBP premiums are being deducted from her Army retired pay. Section IX (SBP Election), item 26 (Beneficiary Category(ies)), the applicant failed to make an election in any of the categories (i.e., a through g), although she did indicate in block g (I Elect Not to Participate in SBP) with an "X" that, "I Do Have Eligible Dependents Under The Plan"; c. Section XI (Certification), item 30...

  • CG | BCMR | Retirement Cases | 2011-041

    Original file (2011-041.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

     If Option A is elected at time of 20 year satisfactory service letter, and spouse concurs, member will have an opportunity to elect into the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) at age 60. (B) Reserve-component annuity participants.--A person who (i) is eligible to participate in the Plan under paragraph (1)(B), and (ii) is married or has a dependent child when he is notified under section 12731(d) of this title that he has completed the years of 2 Pub. § 1448(a)(5), entitled “Participation by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003735

    Original file (20140003735.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of his records to show he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) and payment of the SBP annuity based on the FSM's death. Section X (Spouse Concurrence) states (in part) "If the member selects Option A (declining to make an election until age 60), and the spouse concurs, no annuity will be payable if the member dies prior to reaching age 60." As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006469

    Original file (20080006469.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, when he submitted his application for retired pay in March 2007, both he and his spouse declined SBP coverage. Section V (Additional Information), Item 18 (Is this the only election of coverage you have submitted under the new Survivor Benefit Plan? The evidence of record shows that the applicant submitted a DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), on 29 March 2007, for the purpose of receiving retired pay at age 60.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002540

    Original file (20090002540.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her records be corrected to show she declined participation in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) and that she receive reimbursement for any and all deductions from her retirement pay. The 20-Year Letter, dated 28 July 2004, also stated that "NOTE: Public Law 106-398, 30 October 2000, requires that upon receipt of this Letter, a qualified Reserve Component member, who is married, will automatically be enrolled in the RCSBP under...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011389

    Original file (20140011389 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his 20-year letter was dated 12 October 2000. The new law stated married members who did not submit their elections within 90 days of receiving their 20-year letter were automatically enrolled in the RCSBP for spouse coverage. A statement from the former unit administrator (now a retired first sergeant), dated 23 May 2014, states that at the time the applicant received his 20-year letter personnel staff were informed that automatic election of the SBP would be option C...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011389,

    Original file (20140011389, .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his 20-year letter was dated 12 October 2000. The new law stated married members who did not submit their elections within 90 days of receiving their 20-year letter were automatically enrolled in the RCSBP for spouse coverage. A statement from the former unit administrator (now a retired first sergeant), dated 23 May 2014, states that at the time the applicant received his 20-year letter personnel staff were informed that automatic election of the SBP would be option C...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010758

    Original file (20140010758.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he elected enrollment in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) under Option C (Immediate Coverage) instead of Option A (Deferred Coverage). Once a member elects either option B or option C in any category of coverage, that election is irrevocable. When the applicant received his 20-year letter, he submitted a DD Form 1883 wherein he indicated that he declined to participate in the RCSBP.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007159

    Original file (20130007159.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Section IV (Coverage), she elected Option A - I decline to make an election until age 60; c. Section VIII (Member Signature), the applicant and a witness signed the document on 11 April 2013; d. Section IX (Spouse Concurrence): (1) item 20 (Spouse), "I hereby consent in my spouse's RCSBP election as indicated. However, it appears the applicant's spouse was not notified of the applicant's election to decline SBP because there is no evidence of record that shows a spouse concurrence letter...